Where did nero live

That atrium would have been surrounded by the usual dining, sleeping, and reception rooms, with an attached garden room, or peristyle.

As for the decor… I envisioned his first palace as impressive especially in the eyes of the beleaguered protagonist, Theodosia , but not as over-the-top ostentatious as the two he would build in future years. Theodosia followed the liveried slave through a network of passageways to the most elegant chamber she had ever seen.

Frescoed walls of purple and gold soared into a gilded dome. Fine Greek statues stood guard around the perimeter, and in the center an enormous fish of hammered gold spouted purple-tinted water into a golden pond. The white marble furniture was draped and cushioned with such opulence that someone raised with ordinary wealth would feel out of place.

Despite his brilliant military prowess, his political skills and his Known for his philosophical interests, Marcus Aurelius was one of the most respected emperors in Roman history. He was born into a wealthy and politically prominent family.

Growing up, Marcus Aurelius was a dedicated student, learning Latin and Greek. But his greatest Greek philosophy and rhetoric moved fully into Latin for the first time in the speeches, letters and dialogues of Cicero B. A brilliant lawyer and the first of his family to achieve Roman office, Cicero was one of the In B. He then marched his massive army across the Pyrenees and Alps into central Italy in what would be remembered as one of the most By the time the First Punic War broke out, Rome had become the dominant power throughout the Italian Live TV.

This Day In History. History Vault. The city is in flames…again. The blaze spreads faster and farther than any before it. We have been forced to accept that the writers were prepared to write down their own versions of the truth — for whatever reasons.

But what really happened in the days and nights while Rome burned? The fire starts late in the evening near the Circus Maximus, a popular night-time haunt in ancient Rome. The inferno rages for 9 days. Excavations have confirmed the blaze affected two-thirds of the city. The rapid spread of the fire and the scale of destruction immediately give rise to rumors of arson. Was it the work of arsonists who set fires in various locations, or was a spark enough to cause the blaze? On this July day, the city is in the grip of a heat wave.

There has been no rain for days, even weeks. A small mishap like an overturned oil lamp would have been enough to start a fire that moved quickly, the flames igniting the wooden walls and furnishings. Once the fire burns the length of the Circus, it moves into an area of densely built apartment blocks. The center of the city is soon in ashes, as are the imperial palaces located close to where the fire starts.

Nero's palace is among those destroyed, making it impossible for him to have stood on the roof, serenading the blaze. Marcus Reuter I think that the story of Nero rushing back to Rome to serenade the burning city from the roof of his palace can safely be classified as nothing more than a myth.

The claim that Nero had the fire started to make room for his new palace doesn't stand up to examination either. Marcus Reuter If Nero really had wanted to find space to build his new palace, he would have had any number of other possibilities. He could have simply confiscated properties and had buildings torn down.

It is more likely that the fire started by accident. Marcus Reuter He oversees the firefighting efforts, he proves himself a ruler concerned for his people, he has the parks opened for the homeless, he ensures there is sufficient grain.

Essentially, he fulfils all the expectations the Roman populace has in this situation, which absolutely does not conform to the image of an insane, power-hungry tyrant. Indeed, he sounds more like a reasonable, responsible ruler. Even Tacitus, the only one of the three writers alive during the disaster, credits Nero with effective crisis management. The emperor remains in Rome while the city burns and helps coordinate the rescue efforts, visiting those affected.

In order to save sections of the Roman capitol, Nero has firebreaks cut through the streets. Marcus Reuter After the fire, Nero proves himself to be a forward-thinking statesman. He orders the implementation of construction regulations designed to prevent a repeat of the catastrophe Rome has just experienced. For example, he mandates that fire-resistant materials be used during reconstruction, and that there must be sufficient space between the buildings. The Rome that rises from the ruins has far wider streets, and Nero's fire-safety regulations remain in place into late antiquity.

But, immediately after the blaze, rumors surface that the fire was caused by arson, and that the emperor may be responsible. Martin Zimmermann In order to quell the accusations levelled at him, Nero had to find someone to hold responsible for the Great Fire of Rome. Some in his inner circle suggested that the Christians would make ideal scapegoats. He is said to have had hundreds of innocent Christians brutally put to death, the first persecution of Christians in history….

Eventually, the emperor settles on a new religious sect that is widely disliked and seems to have a motive. The same applies to the Great Fire of Rome. But why were the Christians targeted? What was their significance in ancient Rome? What were their goals? They have strange rituals: burying their dead in catacombs, belief in a single god, refusing to believe in the divine nature of the emperor, all of which are counter to Roman custom. Christian religious history has often censored, exaggerated or falsified facts.

The same applies to Nero's alleged "persecution of Christians. In addition to their unfamiliar practices, early Christians might have hoped for a disaster like the Great Fire. Manfred Clauss In this early period, the Christians yearned for the end of the world — and yet it refused to arrive. The first Christians died, and there was still no indication of an approaching Armageddon. It is therefore easy to imagine that the early Christians celebrated an event such as the Great Fire of Rome as a signal that the end of the world was finally near.

Manfred Clauss Jesus told his apostles to follow him, and it was widely understood that he also meant in death, and in the manner of death. Jesus Christ was executed by the Romans. Accordingly, the early Christians would have considered their execution at the hands of the Romans an honorable death. In this context, it made sense to claim responsibility for the fire, accept blame and be executed in order to get into heaven.

Whether or not Christians set the fire, their claims of responsibility bring them sudden notoriety. The previously unknown sect is now infamous throughout the city. He punishes the Christians in accordance with the law at the time: arsonists are publically burned at the stake.

It is a cruel method of execution, a spectacle, theatre for the people of Rome. As emperor he had to deal with a major catastrophe, the Great Fire of Rome. According to the historians, he found the guilty parties and had them publically punished in accordance with the laws of the time, so that his people's sense of pain and loss could be drowned in the thrill of revenge.

One could almost say that he acted in the only way he could to preserve his reign. Nero's greatest treasure, the "Domus Aurea" or "Golden House" lies buried below these ruins surrounding the Colosseum.

Nero's grand estate was eventually submerged below other structures. No trace remains — at least at ground level. The buildings were only discovered by accident in , when someone fell through a hole in the remains of the Baths of Trajan. Below the baths were the high rooms of the Domus Aurea. Many frescoes and wall decorations were still intact. Nothing like it had been seen before. For example, in the Lives of the Twelve Caesars Roman historian Suetonius identifies Nero by a numerical designation equal to a nefarious deed.

This ancient numerical cryptogram reflected the widespread knowledge that Nero had killed his own mother. Since Gematria is rarely practiced in the world today, it would seem unlikely that John had a 21st or 22nd-century audience.

Of course, the citation above seems to raise an objection against Nero being the Beast since, as Hanegraaff said, his name comes out to 1, Many will go here and there to increase knowledge. In the former, the angel said to seal up the words of the scroll. In the latter, the angel said not to seal up the words of the scroll. On some occasions, it represents a dude, other times it represents a kingdom.

At some places the one Beast has seven heads, which are seven kings collectively considered. But in the very same contexts, the Beast is spoken of as an individual, as one of the heads, as a particular part of the entire monster.

Revelation 17 gives the vision of the seven—headed Beast. The seven heads are seven mountains, on which the woman sitteth. And there are seven kings: five are fallen, and one is, and the other is not yet come; and when he cometh, he must continue a short space. Most New Testament scholars agree that the reference to seven mountains is a reference to Rome.

Here, John says the seven heads not only represent seven mountains on which the woman sits i. John says that five have fallen i. Now, who are these kings? The problem with this objection is that it fails to understand the ancient Jewish mindset. Yes, in the most technical sense, an emperor is not a king. They considered the Caesar reigning at the time to be their king.

Suetonius has written that Nero was the sixth king of Rome. Flavius Josephus, the Jewish contemporary of John, clearly points out that Julius Caesar was the first emperor of Rome and that he was followed in succession by Augustus, Tiberius, Caius, Claudius, and, sixthly, Nero Antiquities, books 18 and People assigned a numerical value to letters of the alphabet.

One of the objections to Nero being the emperor is that when you apply gematria to his name, it comes out to 1,, not The answer is that while John was writing in Greek, he was thinking in Hebrew.

But not if you calculate the Hebrew transliteration of his name, which is Nrwn Qsr. If you apply gematria to the Hebrew transliteration of his name, it comes out to exactly ! You tell me. But what about the mark? No ancient historian records Nero doing this. I believe the mark of the beast is metaphorical. I say this not without precedence. The Anti-Christ has a mark, but what is often overlooked is that Jesus Christ has a mark of his own that he places on his people.

Now, no one that I know of thinks that when we all go to Heaven we will literally have Jesus standing at the pearly gates writing his name and the name of The Father in gematria on our hands and foreheads.

So then, why think that the mark of the beast is any more literal than the mark of the Lamb? For example, Paul talks about those sealed by the Holy Spirit in Ephesians Revelation is comparing and contrasting those owned by the Beast with those owned by God.

I believe what John is referring to here is the imperial cult of Rome whereby the citizens of Rome were required to worship Caesar and offer sacrifices to him. There was a bit of leniency for the Jewish people. Christians however, would not even accept the compromise. As a result, they were socially and economically deprived. In other words, they could not buy or sell anything. Nero had an imperial cult in which he required people to worship him.

He required people to sacrifice to him or at least on behalf of him. Those who worshipped the beast belong to the beast i. Christus, the founder of that name, was put to death as a criminal by Pontius Pilate, procurator of Judea, in the reign of Tiberius, but the pernicious superstition — repressed for a time, broke out yet again, not only through Judea, — where the mischief originated, but through the city of Rome also, whither all things horrible and disgraceful flow from all quarters, as to a common receptacle, and where they are encouraged.

Nero offered his own garden players for the spectacle, and exhibited a Circensian game, indiscriminately mingling with the common people in the dress of a charioteer, or else standing in his chariot.